AI Bots Can Manipulate Online Polls, New Research Shows

AI Bots Can Manipulate Online Polls, New Research Shows
Futuristic 3D Render by Steve Johnson is licensed under unsplash.com
Facebook Tweet LinkedIn ShareThis

The rise of artificial intelligence could pose a potentially disastrous threat to online polling. 

That’s according to a new research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that lays out just how easily online survey research data can be manipulated by AI agents. The paper by Sean Westwood, an associate professor of government at Dartmouth University and the director of the Polarization Research Lab, underscores the emerging threat that AI poses to a pillar of modern data collection and public opinion research.

“We can no longer trust that survey responses are coming from real people,” Westwood said in a press release. “With survey data tainted by bots, AI can poison the entire knowledge ecosystem.”

As part of the research, Westwood designed and tested “an autonomous synthetic respondent” – essentially an AI bot – “capable of producing survey data that possesses the coherence and plausibility of human responses.” That agent then completed surveys, evading detection by standard quality checks 99.8 percent of time.

According to Westwood’s paper, his synthetic respondent was able to avoid detection by the quality checks by simulating “realistic reading times calibrated to a persona’s education level,” generating “human-like mouse movements” and even answered questions by adding in “plausible typos and corrections.”

The problem, the paper argues: Existing fraud-detection measures in online survey research simply aren’t good enough anymore. 

This research is a timely reminder that in politics, information is power—and when the information pipeline is vulnerable, so is the public’s ability to self-govern. If AI can impersonate “public opinion” at scale, then online polling risks becoming less a mirror of the electorate and more a tool for narrative warfare, where the loudest or most sophisticated actor can manufacture momentum or suppress it. That should sharpen a conservative instinct we already hold: trust, but verify—especially when the same institutions that benefit from poll-driven storylines are the ones broadcasting them. The path forward isn’t technocratic panic or censorship; it’s transparency and competition. Pollsters and platforms should be forced by market pressure and public scrutiny to prove their samples are real, disclose their safeguards, and earn credibility instead of assuming it. Campaigns, meanwhile, need to diversify how they read the electorate—grounding strategy in real-world signals, local knowledge, and measurable civic engagement—so they’re not hostage to a data stream that bad actors can hijack. In short, the AI era doesn’t require less skepticism; it requires smarter skepticism, stronger verification, and a renewed respect for reality over manufactured consensus. ~Political Media Inc
Read more at Campaigns & Elections

Connect With Us

Political Media, Inc 1750 Tysons Blvd Ste 1500
McLean, Va 22102
202.558.6640
COPYRIGHT © 2002 - 2025, POLITICAL MEDIA, INC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | Support | Privacy Policy