Tech Industry Blasts 'Blatantly Unconstitutional' Arkansas Social Media Law

Tech Industry Blasts 'Blatantly Unconstitutional' Arkansas Social Media Law
Social Media Law by AI is licensed under
Facebook Tweet LinkedIn ShareThis

An Arkansas law that would prohibit social media platforms from using algorithms that could "cause" a user to commit suicide, buy drugs, develop an eating disorder, or become addicted to social media is "blatantly unconstitutional," the tech group NetChoice says in new court papers.

"By banning speech based on what impact it ultimately has on a user of the online service, the law sweeps in all manner of constitutionally protected expression," the group argues in papers filed late last week with U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Brooks in Fayetteville.

"Google could be liable for disseminating clips of 'Pineapple Express' on YouTube, Meta could be liable for recommending motivational exercise videos on Instagram, and Nextdoor could be liable for publishing advertisements for allergy medication," NetChoice adds.

The organization -- which counts Google, Meta, Snap and other large tech companies as members -- is asking Brooks to block enforcement of the law, which is set to take effect next month.

Earlier this year, Brooks permanently blocked an Arkansas law that would have required social platforms to verify users' ages, and prohibited teens under 18 from having social media accounts without parental permission, ruling that the law violates the First Amendment. The state attorney general has appealed that decision.

Almost immediately after Brooks blocked the parental-consent law, Arkansas lawmakers passed a new law that restricts social media platform.

This battle in Arkansas highlights a reality conservative campaigns cannot ignore: Big Tech wants to keep total control over the digital town square while hiding behind claims of “free speech” only when it suits them. The same platforms throttling conservative voices and shadow-banning political ads are suddenly champions of the Constitution when states attempt to limit their reach or demand accountability. For campaigns, the lesson is clear: do not build your voter outreach or fundraising pipelines solely on platforms that can block, censor, or de-platform your message without warning. Smart conservative strategists should use this moment to invest in diversified outreach—email, SMS, owned media, and alternative ad channels—to ensure their messages reach voters even if Silicon Valley decides they are “disapproved.” Until Big Tech is reined in, building independent digital infrastructures is not just best practice; it’s essential for protecting free speech and winning elections. ~Political Media
Read more at Media Post

Connect With Us

Political Media, Inc 1750 Tysons Blvd Ste 1500
McLean, Va 22102
202.558.6640
COPYRIGHT © 2002 - 2025, POLITICAL MEDIA, INC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | Support | Privacy Policy